FirstHandIB ESS
Data & Graphs · Skill 5 · SL & HL
Interpreting data & graphs

Interpreting trends and their strength

In the exam, you need to be able to spot the general trend of a graph and, sometimes, understand how strong that trend actually is.

When could this come up?

Paper 1 and Paper 2 both use a lot of graphs

Paper 1 and Paper 2 both include a lot of graphs to show trends in human behaviour, natural changes or other changes in the world.

It is also possible that the IB not only asks you to spot the general trend of a graph, but also to understand and interpret the actual strength of that trend.

To do that in the exam, you need to know two things:

Correlation coefficient, r

Direction + strength of a linear relationship.

Coefficient of determination, R²

How much of the variation is explained by the fitted model.

Exam focus: interpret these values. You do not need to calculate them here.
1
Part 1

Correlation coefficient, r

Direction and strength of a linear relationship.

The idea

How it works

The correlation coefficient tells you whether two variables move together in a positive or negative direction, and how strong that relationship is.

Cartoon margarine and separating couple illustration
Example

Margarine consumption & divorce in Maine

From 2000-2009, these two completely unrelated variables had an extremely strong positive correlation of about r = +0.993.

That does not mean margarine causes divorce. Both variables simply changed in a very similar way over time.

Margarine consumption and divorce rate in Maine, 2000-2009
Margarine consumption Maine divorce rate
Source: Tyler Vigen, Spurious Correlations. Vigen cites USDA data for margarine consumption and CDC National Vital Statistics for divorce rates.
Positive vs negative correlation

The sign of r tells you the direction

Positive correlation

As X increases, Y tends to increase.

r > 0

Negative correlation

As X increases, Y tends to decrease.

r < 0

r tells you two things: the sign gives you the direction, and how close r is to +1 or -1 gives you the strength.

Interactive · Explore r

How close are the points to the trendline?

Move the slider. The closer the points are to the grey trendline, the stronger the correlation.

Correlation coefficient
r = 0.75
Positive correlationRelatively strong linear relationship

Positive r = both variables generally increase together. Negative r = one generally decreases as the other increases.

2
Part 2

Coefficient of determination, R²

How much of the variation the model actually explains.

r vs R²

What is the difference between r and R²?

r

Direction + strength.

r = -0.80 → strong negative linear correlation.

R²

How much variation the model explains.

R² = 0.64 → 64% of the variation in Y is explained by the model.

For a simple linear relationship:

R² = r². So if r = -0.80, then R² = 0.64.

Because r is squared, R² does not tell you whether the relationship is positive or negative.

Interactive · Explore R²

Higher R² = the model explains more of the variation

Move the slider and watch how tightly the data fit the grey trendline.

R² = 0.64
Coefficient of determination
R² = 0.64
64% of variation explained36% remains unexplained by this model
Explained64%
3
Part 3

Putting it together

Write r and R² as exam sentences, then practise on your own.

How to write it

Turn the number into one sentence

r
r = -0.86
There is a strong negative linear correlation between distance from the pollution source and pollutant concentration: as distance increases, pollutant concentration tends to decrease.
R²
R² = 0.64
The model explains 64% of the observed variation in the dependent variable. The remaining 36% is not explained by the model.
Quick memory rule: r = direction + strength. R² = proportion of variation explained.
Your turn

Interpret r and R²

Graph 1 · r
r = +0.82
Graph 2 · R²
R² = 0.68
Watch out

Common mistakes

r is not a percentage.

r = 0.8 does not mean 80% is explained.

R² has no direction.

Use the graph or sign of r for positive vs negative.

Correlation ≠ causation.

Strong correlation does not prove one variable caused the other.

IB ESS revision on FirstHandIB